Save on your first order! Their point is to involve the opponent of the speaker into a debate and to encourage them to negotiate. Actually, Rogerian rhetoric can be considered as a peculiar version of the democratic debate. It may seem that a Rogerian topic presupposes the only point of view.
Our tradition of argument goes back to classical Greece when speakers tried to sway fellow voters in the early democratic debates over policy. Building on this tradition of pro and con, our judicial system goes even further to emphasize the adversarial nature of many arguments.
Many arguments build toward consensus. Another approach our authors don't describe is called Rogerian argument. Based on Carl Rogers' work in psychology, Rogerian argument begins by assuming that a willing writer can find middle or common ground with a willing reader.
Instead of promoting the adversarial relationship that traditional or classical argument typically sets up between reader and writer, Rogerian argument assumes that if reader and writer can both find common ground about a problem, they are more likely to find a solution to that problem. Based on these assumptions, Rogerian argument develops along quite different lines than a traditional argument often does.
In the introduction to a Rogerian argument, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem. Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement and in effect can be seen as an attack on a reader who holds an opposing viewthe Rogerian argument does not begin with the writer's position at all.
Next, the writer describes as fairly as possible--typically in language as neutral as possible--the reader's perceived point of view on the problem. Only if the writer can represent the reader's perspective accurately will the reader begin to move toward compromise, and so this section of the argument is crucial to the writer's credibility.
|Tips for Writing a Thesis Statement for a Rogerian Argument||Arguments were built around gaining consensus with the listeners through seeking a middle ground when negotiating.|
|Library & Learning Commons Tour||Pin it What is a Rogerian Argument? We often find speakers and authors getting involved or facing a kind of aggression and challenge defending their point of view amongst people who disagree with them.|
|30 Best Rogerian Argument Topics - grupobittia.com||Our tradition of argument goes back to classical Greece when speakers tried to sway fellow voters in the early democratic debates over policy.|
Even though writers might be tempted to use this section of the Rogerian argument to manipulate readers, that strategy usually backfires when readers perceive the writer's insincerity. Good will is crucial to the success of a Rogerian argument.
Moreover, as part of the writer's commitment to expressing the reader's perspective on the problem, the writer acknowledges the circumstances and contexts in which the reader's position or perspective is valid.
In the next main chunk of the Rogerian argument, the writer then presents fairly and accurately his or her own perspective or position on the problem. This segment depends, again, on neutral but clear language so that the reader perceives the fair-mindedness of the writer's description.
The segment is, however, a major factor in whether or not the writer is ultimately convincing, and so key evidence supports and develops this section of the argument. Like the description of the reader's perspective, this part of the argument also includes a description of the contexts or circumstances in which the writer's position is valid.
The Rogerian essay closes not by asking readers to give up their own positions on the problem but by showing how the reader would benefit from moving toward the writer's position. In other words, the final section of the Rogerian argument lays out possible ways to compromise or alternative solutions to the problem that would benefit both reader and writer under more circumstances than either perspective alone accounts for.
Rogerian approaches are particularly useful for emotionally charged, highly divisive issues. The Rogerian approach typically downplays the emotional in favor of the rational so that people of good will can find solutions to common problems.
But no argument, Rogerian or otherwise, will succeed unless the writer understands the reader. Rogerian argument is especially dependent on audience analysis because the writer must present the reader's perspective clearly, accurately, and fairly. If you want to read more about Rogerian argument, Kate Kiefer has additional explanations and sample texts available in Eddy.State your thesis.
*from the Tips for Rogerian Essay Example and Topic Ideas Sample of a Rogerian Essay. List of topics for the Rogerian Essay. Rogerian Essay Research Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Opposing Viewpoints in Context is an online resource covering social issues.
Additional Sources for How to Write a Rogerian Essay If you’re still looking for help with your Rogerian essay, there are several places you can turn to. Writing Commons has a wealth of resources for almost any kind of writing you can imagine.
Rogerian essay writing guide for students, grupobittia.com How To Write A Rogerian Essay. March 31, The conclusion should not conclude by showing that the author thesis is the better option but state that the author’s idea combined with other ideas presented will help in solving the essay. Rogerian essay thesis.
November 21, Rogerian essay thesis. Majored in unafraid essay writing zhuo yue wang dissertation what was the american dream today essay maturaarbeit beispiel essay.
James watson and francis crick essay lalla essaydi artwork lighting us peace institute essay help. Sep 10, · A Rogerian essay differs a lot from the other types of academic writing. The most important thing, which makes it so unique, is that it has practical application.
It gives real solutions to conflicts and debates. A Rogerian argument usually begins with the writer exploring the common ground she or he shares with the grupobittia.com the introduction, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem.
Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement which in effect can be seen as an attack on a.